Report: Police arrest sober man for drunk driving

We have covered several drunk driving cases during the past few weeks including the case of Utah Highway Patrol officer Lisa Steed, who allegedly arrested many sober individuals for DUI.

The Lisa Steed case is a strong reminder of the subjective nature of many drunk driving arrests. Field sobriety tests and many of the intoxication exams used by officers are less than scientific. This means that every year thousands of people are unnecessarily arrested for DUI.

One recent high profile false arrest case comes out of Arizona and demonstrates the subjective nature of a DUI arrest. The case involves a 64-year-old man who was returning home from the gym. He was pulled over for crossing a white line of a traffic lane and promptly accused of being intoxicated.

The driver told the officer that he had been swimming, but the officer insisted that the man’s irritated eyes were due to intoxication. Before undergoing a field sobriety test, the man informed the officer that he was going to have hip replacement surgery in two days, but the officer forced him to do physically demanding field sobriety tests anyway.

Ultimately the driver was arrested despite registering a 0.000 in a breathalyzer tests. Subsequent tests revealed that the man did not have any drugs or alcohol in his system.

The man told reporters that he has been stopped over 10 times in his Arizona community, and that this most recent arrest caused his vehicle to be impounded and his license to be suspended, despite him being sober.

“This was a case of D-W-B – driving while black,” the man’s attorney said. The man is suing the police department for $50,000.

“He is being harassed for no other reason than the color of his skin,” another lawyer said. “It’s frustrating that somebody had to go through this type of experience, they poke and prod him and arrest him for nothing.”

Source: Deseret News, “Sober man gets arrested for DUI in Arizona,” Michael Smith, June 10, 2013

Call Now

Disclaimer

The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for advice regarding your individual situation. We invite you to contact us and welcome your calls, letters and electronic mail. Contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not send any confidential information to us until such time as an attorney-client relationship has been established.

The user and reader of this information should beware because although we strive to keep the information timely and accurate, there will often be a delay between official publication of the materials and their appearance in or modification of this system, and every case must be looked at individually. Thus, we make no express or implied guarantees that the information on this site is correct, and it should not be relied upon. The Federal Register and the Code of Federal Regulations remain the official sources for regulatory information published by the Department of Labor, and before you do anything, you should consult an attorney, who can review the specifics of your matter. We will make every effort to correct errors brought to our attention, but laws and regulations are constantly changing, and we may at times even misinterpret them.