No more mandatory minimum sentences for drug offenders

In a surprise move earlier this month, Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. announced that the federal government would no longer seek mandatory minimum penalties for low-level drug crimes. The move promises to drastically reduce the prison sentences handed out to first-time, nonviolent offenders.

Mandatory minimum sentences are laws passed by Congress that force judges to apply a certain amount of prison time in cases that involve a certain amount of drugs. The laws have long been controversial for taking power away from judges and for applying unnecessarily long prison sentences. With this recent announcement, the Obama Administration is clearly making a move to correct what it is now calling an “injustice.”

Of course, the Attorney General does not have the power to repeal mandatory minimum sentencing laws; that would require an act of Congress. Instead, Holder has instructed prosecutors to charge offenders with offenses that do not carry minimum sentences.

The move promises to not only ease the harsh sentences for drug offenders, but also to solve a huge problem for the federal government. Federal prisons are critically overcrowded, due in large part to long sentences for drug offenders. Bypassing mandatory sentencing laws will likely ease the pressure on prison populations.

Holder’s decision has already been greeted enthusiastically by many here in Utah. Several years ago, one Utah man received a 55-year sentence for a drug crime, a prison term dictated by mandatory sentencing laws. The presiding judge, who had no power to overrule the mandatory sentence, called it “cruel, unusual and irrational.” In light of Holder’s new position, the man is applying for clemency from President Obama.

Though the new position on mandatory sentencing laws is an improvement in many ways, those charged with drug crimes should still work to defend themselves against such accusations. Although prison sentences may have been lowered in many cases, a conviction for drug crimes can still carry enormous consequences for one’s personal and professional life. In such cases, it is often best to speak to an attorney for assistance.

Source: ABC-4 Utah, “Federal mandatory minimum sentences no longer a priority” Marcos Ortiz, Aug. 12, 2013

Call Now

Disclaimer

The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for advice regarding your individual situation. We invite you to contact us and welcome your calls, letters and electronic mail. Contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not send any confidential information to us until such time as an attorney-client relationship has been established.

The user and reader of this information should beware because although we strive to keep the information timely and accurate, there will often be a delay between official publication of the materials and their appearance in or modification of this system, and every case must be looked at individually. Thus, we make no express or implied guarantees that the information on this site is correct, and it should not be relied upon. The Federal Register and the Code of Federal Regulations remain the official sources for regulatory information published by the Department of Labor, and before you do anything, you should consult an attorney, who can review the specifics of your matter. We will make every effort to correct errors brought to our attention, but laws and regulations are constantly changing, and we may at times even misinterpret them.