Mandatory Presumptions vs. Permissive Inferences

A jury instruction can violate a defendant’s due process rights when it receives prosecutors of their obligation to prove every essential element of a crime beyond a reasonable doubt.

When reviewing appeals based on jury instructions, appeals courts determine whether a challenged jury instruction created a mandatory presumption or simply allowed a jury to draw a “permissive inference.”

A mandatory presumption instructs jurors to infer a presumed fact if the State proves certain other facts. A permissive inference suggests to a jury a possible conclusion to be drawn if the state proves certain facts, but does not require the jury to make that conclusion.

Example mandatory presumption:

“If the state proves that a defendant possessed stolen property, then you must conclude that the defendant stole the property.”

Example permissive inference:

“If the state proves that a defendant possessed stolen property, then you may infer that the defendant stole the property.”

The permissive inference does not violate a defendant’s due process rights because the state still has to convince the jury to make the conclusion based on the facts that the state has proved.


The Salt Lake City criminal defense team at Greg Smith & Associates handles criminal cases throughout Utah. If you or a loved one is under investigation or has been charged with a crime, call us at 801-651-1512 or contact us online.

Call Now

Disclaimer

The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for advice regarding your individual situation. We invite you to contact us and welcome your calls, letters and electronic mail. Contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not send any confidential information to us until such time as an attorney-client relationship has been established.

The user and reader of this information should beware because although we strive to keep the information timely and accurate, there will often be a delay between official publication of the materials and their appearance in or modification of this system, and every case must be looked at individually. Thus, we make no express or implied guarantees that the information on this site is correct, and it should not be relied upon. The Federal Register and the Code of Federal Regulations remain the official sources for regulatory information published by the Department of Labor, and before you do anything, you should consult an attorney, who can review the specifics of your matter. We will make every effort to correct errors brought to our attention, but laws and regulations are constantly changing, and we may at times even misinterpret them.