Airborne Hunting Act

Aviation is a popular recreational activity in Utah because of our state’s many dramatic landscapes. Utah’s wildlife sometimes creates unique challenges for small airplane pilots and run-ins with flocks of birds can spur serious federal wildlife crimes charges.

The Airborne Hunting Act is a federal law that prohibits shooting or harassing animals with planes. There are very few exceptions to the Airborne Hunting Act, which is also called the Shooting from Aircraft Act.

Congress enacted the Airborne Hunting Act in 1971 in response to public outcry over an NBC video depicting wolves being shot from an airplane. The law is broadly written, however, so prosecutions have been brought against non-hunters accused of disturbing animals with airplanes or parachutes.

Utah Airborne Hunting Defense Attorneys

Charges can be brought under the Airborne Hunting Act against any individual who shoots or attempts to shoot an animal for the purpose of capturing or attempting to kill the animal. Federal prosecutors can also bring charges against individuals who use aircraft to “harass” birds, fish or other animals.

The wildlife crimes defense attorneys at Greg Smith and Associates handle airborne hunting and harassment cases throughout Utah. We can help defend you against even the most complex charges for airborne hunting activities that occur around the Great Salt Lake, Bear Lake, Utaba Reservoir and any other Utah forest or wildlife refuge.

Contact us online or call our office at 801-651-1512 to set up a free consultation with one of our criminal defense attorneys.

Penalties Under the Airborne Hunting Act

Anyone who is convicted under the Airborne Hunting Act can face serious fines and prison terms. Federal officials are permitted to fine individuals up to $5,000 and imprison violators up to a year.

A significant part of airborne hunting penalties includes forfeiture. Any animal shot from an aircraft as well as a pilot’s plane and weapons are subject to forfeiture. The Airborne Hunting Act also applies to individuals who assist in airborne hunting, which means that a pilot could lose his or her plane even if a passenger was engaged in the shooting or animal harassment activities.

Prosecutions under the Airborne Hunting Act are often brought against non-hunters because federal courts have held that the harassment prohibitions of the law are independent of the law’s aircraft hunting ban. This has allowed prosecutors to go after individuals such as skydivers who have been accused of scaring animals while landing.

Contact Us

The wildlife crime defense attorneys at Greg Smith and Associates represent those who have been accused of airborne animal hunting and harassment throughout Utah. We handle airborne hunting cases that occur in all Utah parks and recreational areas, including Weber County North Fork Park, Round Valley Wildlife Management Area and Capital Reef National Park.

Our lead attorney, Gregory B. Smith, has prosecutorial experience and knows what tactics federal prosecutors will use to bring airborne animal harassment charges. To set up a free consultation with one of our lawyers, call us at 801-651-1512 or contact us online.

We Can Help You Now

  • This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Feedback From Satisfied Clients
5/5
Office Location
7324 Union Park Avenue
Midvale, Utah 84047
 

Telephone: 801-641-3397
Fax: 801-255-2134
Salt Lake City Law Office Map

Call Now

Disclaimer

The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for advice regarding your individual situation. We invite you to contact us and welcome your calls, letters and electronic mail. Contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not send any confidential information to us until such time as an attorney-client relationship has been established.

The user and reader of this information should beware because although we strive to keep the information timely and accurate, there will often be a delay between official publication of the materials and their appearance in or modification of this system, and every case must be looked at individually. Thus, we make no express or implied guarantees that the information on this site is correct, and it should not be relied upon. The Federal Register and the Code of Federal Regulations remain the official sources for regulatory information published by the Department of Labor, and before you do anything, you should consult an attorney, who can review the specifics of your matter. We will make every effort to correct errors brought to our attention, but laws and regulations are constantly changing, and we may at times even misinterpret them.